버그 바운티 보상은 심각도 및 취약점의 영향력에 따라 그룹화됩니다. 각 심각도 수준에 해당하는 취약점 유형에 대한 예시와 설명은 아래에서 확인할 수 있습니다. 지급 금액은 웹사이트/앱과 스마트 계약에 대해 별도의 척도가 있는 4단계 구조로 되어 있습니다.

직책 입력

헤드라인

직책

{{currentSectionTitle}}에 대해 더 알아보기

이름

제목을 입력해 주세요

취약점과 영향을 받는 자산에 대한 간략한 설명을 입력하세요.

주제

핵심 팀은 국제 사법 협력, 형사 사법 시스템, 자금 세탁 방지 및 부패 측면에서 낮은 종합 등급을 받은 국가에 위치하고 있습니다. 이러한 맥락적 데이터는 사기를 예방하고 완화하는 데 있어 어려움과 복잡성이 증가했음을 시사합니다.

핵심 팀은 국제 사법 협력, 형사 사법 시스템, 자금 세탁 방지 및 부패 측면에서 중간 등급을 받은 국가에 위치하고 있습니다. 이러한 상황별 데이터는 중간 수준의 지리적 책임성을 시사하며, 따라서 사기 위험을 줄이고 완화할 수 있습니다.

핵심 팀은 국제 사법 협력, 형사 사법 시스템, 자금 세탁 방지 및 부패 측면에서 가장 높은 종합 등급을 받은 국가에 위치해 있습니다. 이러한 상황별 데이터는 가장 높은 수준의 지리적 책임을 시사하며, 따라서 위험 감소 및 완화를 극대화합니다.

본 웹사이트에 제공된 정보는 투자 자문, 재정 자문, 거래 자문 또는 기타 어떠한 종류의 자문도 구성하지 않으며, 웹사이트의 콘텐츠를 그러한 목적으로 해석해서는 안 됩니다. CertiK는 어떠한 암호화폐의 매수, 매도 또는 보유도 권장하지 않습니다. 투자 결정을 내리기 전에 반드시 자체적인 실사를 수행하고 재정 고문과 상담하십시오.

취약점 제목

For years, the "Scalability-Security-Decentralization Trilemma" was considered an unbreakable law of blockchain physics. However, at the recent ETH ChiangMai event, Vitalik Buterin challenged this notion, declaring it an engineering problem rather than a mathematical impossibility. This quest explores how Ethereum is using cutting-edge technologies like zk-SNARKs and PeerDAS to break this mold, moving from theoretical trade-offs to a future where high capacity and decentralization coexist.

Solving the Impossible – Ethereum's Engineering Breakthrough

Read and Learn

From "Math Theorem" to "Engineering Challenge" Historically, it was believed that a blockchain could only achieve two of three attributes: Decentralization, Security, and Scalability. Vitalik's latest view flips this script. He argues that the Trilemma is not an absolute limit but a phased engineering hurdle. By decoupling Data Availability from Execution and introducing novel verification mechanisms, Ethereum is proving that it is possible to scale throughput without centralizing the network or compromising security.


Paradigm Shift

The "BitTorrent" of Consensus To solve data congestion, Ethereum is implementing PeerDAS (Peer Data Availability Sampling). In traditional blockchains, every node must download every byte of data to verify a block. PeerDAS allows nodes to function like a BitTorrent network, randomly downloading and verifying only small "samples" of data. Using mathematical "Erasure Coding," the network guarantees that the full data exists as long as enough distributed samples are available, boosting capacity while keeping nodes lightweight.


PeerDAS

"One Works, All Verify" On the computation layer, zk-SNARKs (Zero-Knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Arguments of Knowledge) introduce a revolutionary efficiency model. Instead of every node re-executing every transaction (N-of-N execution), a single "Prover" performs the heavy computation and generates a tiny cryptographic proof. The rest of the network simply verifies this proof in milliseconds. This allows the network to process thousands of transactions off-chain while inheriting the full security of the main chain.


zk-SNARKs

Real-World Implementation：This is no longer just whitepaper theory. Vitalik highlighted that these solutions are already "living code" on the Ethereum roadmap. Upgrades integrating PeerDAS and advanced ZK-EVMs are moving onto the mainnet. The transition has shifted from "Is this possible?" to "How do we safely deploy this?" We are witnessing the live evolution of the protocol as it begins to handle throughput levels previously thought impossible for a decentralized system.


Real-World Implementation

Security Maturity While the engineering path is clear, the journey isn't over. Vitalik cautions that the next phase is about "Security Maturity." Complex cryptographic components like ZK circuits and PeerDAS logic need time to be battle-tested against attacks. The focus for the coming years (2026–2030) will shift from raw performance upgrades to hardening these new systems, ensuring that this complex engineering machinery is as robust as the simple proof-of-work systems of the past.


The Road Ahead

Take the Quiz

As an unbreakable law of physics that will never change. 

As a temporary engineering problem that can be solved with technology. 

As a financial problem that can be solved by charging higher fees. 

As a reason to abandon blockchain for centralized databases.

 By forcing every node to buy larger hard drives to store more data. 

By using a centralized server to store all blockchain history. 

By allowing nodes to verify data availability by downloading only small random samples.

By deleting old transaction history to make space for new blocks.


They allow the network to verify heavy computations quickly using a small cryptographic proof. 

They make all transactions on the network completely invisible to everyone.

They replace the need for consensus mechanisms entirely. 

They increase the gas fees to discourage people from using the network.
